I sent the following rapid response to the BMJ for each of the articles below; however, the BMJ chose not to accept nor publish my response. I guess that my questioning the “golden calf” of Fake Science is too much for that publication. So much for “scientific inquiry” and the other high ideals that we have been bamboozled with regarding science.
Covid–19: Norway investigates 23 deaths in frail elderly patients after vaccination, BMJ 2021; 372, Published 15 January 2021. Response submitted on 18 February 2021.
Covid–19: First UK vaccine safety data are “reassuring,” says regulator, BMJ 2021; 372, Published 08 February 2021. Response submitted on 25 February 2021.
The human population of Planet Earth has been told a huge lie (legal and scientific fraud) over the past several centuries, at least, with regards to the unproven “germ theory of disease causation” and its affiliates (antibiotics, antibacterials, vaccines/serums/inoculations/anti–toxins, etc.). In order to help unravel this fraud, I am enclosing several questions and quotations.
1) Unanswered questions:
Has anyone actually proved that “germs” cause disease thus confirming all of Robert Koch's Postulates as well as Thomas M. River's Postulates? Has this been reproduced?
Has anyone actually proved that the “SARS–CoV–2 virus” (“coronavirus”) causes the “dis–ease” named “COVID–19” thus confirming all of Robert Koch's Postulates as well as Thomas M. River's Postulates? Has this been reproduced? If not, then why not? And if not, then why has the world been so drastically changed?
Has any “health” authority in the world been successful at isolating the “SARS–CoV–2 virus” (“coronavirus”) from “patient–zero” in Wuhan, China? If not, then why not?
Has that isolated “virus” been used in the production of all of the “COVID–19” “dis–ease”–confirming tests? If not, then why not?
Was that isolated “virus” used in the production of the numerous “COVID–19” vaccines? If not, then why not? If not, then what genetic material, if any, is being used in the vaccines?
If “viruses” are not alive, then how are they attenuated? Do “viruses” actually exist or are they exosomes?
If “germs” don't cause “dis–ease”, then through what process(es) do we become sick/ill?
How many people have been adversely affected, including dying, from the applications of the fraudulent “germ theory of disease causation” and its affiliates (antibiotics, antibacterials, vaccines/serums/inoculations/anti–toxins, etc.) over the past several centuries?
2) Quotations exposing the fraudulent “germ theory of disease causation”, showing known adverse reactions from vaccines, a quote from Bill Gates on population reduction, and lastly a quote providing an acronym for the “dis–ease” known as “COVID–19”:
“He who considers disease results to be the disease itself, and expects to do away with these as disease, is insane. It is an insanity in medicine, an insanity that has grown out of the milder forms of mental disorder in science, crazy whims. The bacteria are results of disease. In the course of time we will be able to show perfectly that the microscopical little fellows are not the disease cause, but that they come after, that they are scavengers accompanying the disease, and that they are perfectly harmless in every respect. They are the outcome of the disease, are present wherever the disease is, and by the microscope it has been discovered that every pathological result has its corresponding bacteria. The Old School consider these the cause, but we will be able to show that disease cause is much more subtle than anything that can be shown by a microscope. We will be able to show you by a process of reasoning, step by step, the folly of hunting for disease cause by the implements of the senses.”
—James Tyler Kent, A.M., M.D., The Art and Science of Homeopathic Medicine, Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., Page 22, 2002. [Originally published as Lectures on Homœopathic Philosophy in 1900.]
“If virulent germs were normal in the atmosphere, how numerous would be the occasions for their penetration independently by way of the lungs and intestinal mucus! There would not be a wound, however slight, the prick even of a pin, that would not be the occasion for infecting us with smallpox, typhus, syphilis, gonorrhoea.”
—Professor Béchamp, as quoted in Béchamp or Pasteur?: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology By Ethel D. Hume on page 308 [prefaced by Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter: The Germ Theory Exploded By R. B. Pearson], ISBN# 978–1–46790–012–6, 2011
“The general public, however intelligent, are struck only by that which it takes little trouble to understand. They have been told that the interior of the body is something more or less like the contents of a vessel filled with wine, and that this interior is not injured — that we do not become ill, except when germs, originally created morbid, penetrate into it from without, and then become microbes.
The public do not know whether this is true; they do not even know what a microbe is, but they take it on the word of the master; they believe it because it is simple and easy to understand; they believe and they repeat that the microbe makes us ill without inquiring further, because they have not the leisure — nor, perhaps, the capacity — to probe to the depths that which they are asked to believe.”
—Professor Béchamp, preface to La Théorie du Microzyma, as quoted in Béchamp or Pasteur?: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology By Ethel D. Hume on page 304 [prefaced by Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter: The Germ Theory Exploded By R. B. Pearson], ISBN# 978–1–46790–012–6, 2011
“In typhoid fever, in gangrene, and in anthrax, the existence has been proved of bacteria in the tissues and in the blood, and one was very much disposed to take them for granted as cases of ordinary parasitism. It is evident, after what we have said, that instead of maintaining that the affection has had as its origin and cause the introduction into the organism of foreign germs with their consequent action, one should affirm that one is dealing here with an alteration of the functions of microzymas, an alteration indicated by the change that has taken place in their form.”
—Professor Béchamp, Comptes Rendus 75, p. 1525, 1869, as quoted in Béchamp or Pasteur?: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology By Ethel D. Hume on page 219 [prefaced by Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter: The Germ Theory Exploded By R. B. Pearson], ISBN# 978–1–46790–012–6, 2011
“There is an implication to be found in the statement of Surgeon Verneuil, though probably not meant by him, to which assent must be given when understood. It is TRUE that there is no such THING as tetanus, small pox. syphilis, etc., as is implied by the general use of nosological terms. Disease is not a thing, an entity: it is a condition, and the error of regarding the condition of disease as an entity has confirmed, where it has not originated, much of the prevailing erroneous treatment of the sick.
Nosological terms have a use; it is that of bringing to the mind of the physician a group of pathological symptoms, which may or may not be present in the case of the patient under consideration; from them, when present, the diseased condition of the patient can be recognized and treated. Unfortunately, through not understanding this truth, attempts are frequently made to treat, not the patient, but the name, which has been given to a collection of morbid symptoms.
A broken limb is a thing; the inflammation which results from it is a condition, and if gangrene ensues the gangrene is not a thing, but a condition to be taken into consideration with all the other symptoms in the treatment of the patient. The surgeon, Verneuil, had probably a glimmering perception of this truth, but he misapplied it, for his theory and practice, as a physician, and the theory and practice of nearly all modern medicine assume that the condition to be treated is a thing having a name and this name is treated instead of the patient.”
—Montague R. Leverson, The Blood and its Third Anatomical Element By Antoine Bechamp, 1912, Translated by Montague R. Leverson, [WHALE Oct 2005], http://whale.to/v/bechamp_b1.html
“The ultimate foundation question of the science of bacteriology is, How did the disease germs become disease germs? But the question is still unanswered.”
—Woods Hutchinson. A.M., M.D., As quoted in The Golden Calf: An Exposure of Vaccine–Therapy By Charles W. Forward, Second Edition, 1933, http://whale.to/v/golden_calf.html
“With the increased use of therapeutic serums in the past twenty years, much has been written of the various manifestations of anaphylaxis. Urticaria, arthralgia, adenopathy and cardiac collapse are well known complications of serum therapy. Coma and occasionally death have been reported following serum injection. Many reports of multiple neuritis and myelitis following the use of Pasteur treatment have appeared, and encephalitis following vaccination is well known. Another unpleasant complication of prophylactic efforts, and fortunately one less frequently seen, is multiple neuritis.”
—George Wilson, M.D. and Samuel B. Hadden, M.D., Neuritis and Multiple Neuritis Following Serum Therapy, JAMA. 1932;98(2):123–125, January 9, 1932 [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/1153665]. Also archived at https://archive.vn/Nw4nq
“First, we've got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services [my emphasis}, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.”
—William Henry Gates III (better known as Bill Gates), Bill Gates — TED2010: Innovating to zero! [https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero/transcript]. Also archived at https://archive.vn/gm9Z5
“Corona virus — COVID–19, which is an acronym that stands for, “Certificate Of Vaccination Identification (C.O.V.I.D.) — Artificial Intelligence (1 represents the first letter in the alphabet = A and 9 represents the ninth letter in the alphabet = I).””
—Robert O. Young, CPT, MS, D.SC., Ph.D., Posted on 04/23/2020, pHorever Young Blog: The Corona Virus is Just a Concept That Only Exists on Paper [https://phoreveryoung.wordpress.com/2020/04/23/the-corona-virus-is-just-a-concept-that-only-exists-on-paper/]